2005 Poplar project team Q+A participants: Kari Magill, CEO of Rowley Properties; Bethany Madsen, AIA, LEED AP BD+C, Principal + Owner of VIA Architecture; Bill DeJarlais, LEED AP BD+C, Principal + Executive VP at GLY Construction; Chris Duvall, P.E., S.E., Principal at Coughlin Porter Lundeen

First things first. What are the benefits of Mass Timber? Why invest in it?

The list is lengthy. Kari and Bethany narrow it down to three of the most important benefits from an owner and architect’s perspective:

1. Mass timber leaves a lighter carbon footprint than steel and concrete. As an inherently sustainable product, timber sequesters carbon, helping to mitigate climate change. Also, if sourced in partnership with sustainably managed forests, you’re working with a renewable energy source instead of fossil-fuel intensive and nonrenewable materials such as concrete and steel.
2. The efficient mass timber production and installation process has potential to benefit both schedule and budget. By prefabricating large mass timber panels off site, crews can install them quickly once they arrive. Mass timber also weighs less than concrete framing systems, simplifying the overall building structure.
3. As humans, we respond well to natural material and thus, exposed mass timber. An increasing number of studies link tenants’ improved health and well-being to the biophilic aspects of wood. For example, recent neuroscience studies demonstrate that touching wood actively lowers the human stress hormone in our bodies.

What are the limitations in using CLT, or Mass Timber in general?

Kari: Mass timber is a beautiful but finnicky product. First, due to its application, mass timber is limited to specific types of wood and grains. You can always stain it, but beware of the factory sealant…it will change the color of the stain. Second, CLT panels arrive in several shipments, increasing the risk of imperfect color matching. Third, shipping dunnage blemishes the wood. Naturally, you want to sand out the markings, but once sanded, the stain in those areas won’t match the rest of the wood.

Bethany: If using CLT, you will want to coordinate panel size and layout needs with the manufacturer. On 2005 Poplar, we were limited on the roof cantilever in some locations due to the axis of the lamination and panel size. The CLT is directional and has a ‘strong axis’ resulting from the odd number of laminations. This limits the unsupported distance for the CLT if a panel needs to rotate in the overall layout. This limit is typical of all structural systems and just needs to be coordinated carefully. Additionally, to emphasize Kari’s comment, thoroughly review the wood species and finish/stain with the manufacturer—especially if you intend to expose the CLT and coordinate it with other finishes.

In general, acoustics, fire, and systems routing are the primary limitations when using mass timber in an exposed structural condition. However, the right team will provide thoughtful design solutions to these hurdles.

Chris: Mass timber panels such as CLT are not pre-approved for seismic load resistance under the current Washington State Building Code. Section 104.5 allows alternative materials to be used in such cases if the team can demonstrate code-equivalency. This is exactly what we did on 2005 Poplar. Designers should approach jurisdictions early in design and begin the alternative review process as it may take some time to satisfy the building official.

Finding the right mass timber supplier/manufacturer can be a challenge. Do mills specialize in certain mass timber systems? Are mass timber systems considered long lead items in terms of construction scheduling or phasing?

Bill: Generally, yes, mills are set up with specialized equipment to produce certain types of mass timber. Given the time it takes just to get in the queue for engineering and approvals, manufacturing, and shipment to the site, mass timber is absolutely a long-lead item. Don’t assume a reliable delivery either. Without local mills, distance often impacts the timber’s journey to the jobsite.

Bethany: Mills also source different types of wood and species, which affects the final wood grain, aesthetic, and even structural capacity of the product. Some manufacturers produce mass timber intended for industrial application as opposed to architectural. It’s important to understand the finish quality of their final product—and finish coatings—to be sure that it meets your aesthetic and performance expectations.

Panel size also varies by manufacturer. Since panel size influences panel layout, and thus, your design, you’ll need to find a manufacturer that can work with the required dimensions.

From a contractor’s and structural engineer’s point of view, what is a perfect buildable MT system?

Bill: Every project is different but ideally, the perfect mass timber system is a result of the team’s research, analyses, and cost studies. It is the team’s responsibility to find the right balance between owner budget, design ambition, and schedule optimization.

Chris: Achieving efficient and affordable mass timber systems is really unique to each project. Post and beam solutions seem to work best for most building layouts and achieve efficiency targets such as limiting timber fiber. Additionally, economizing the total piece count can reduce construction time and costs by reducing crane picks. Fewer panels, beams and columns = less crane time = reduced costs.

Furthermore, there are several different mass timber panel products made in the Northwest, each with their own unique structural capabilities. Some products fit certain uses better than others. On 2005 Poplar, we needed a thin-profile roof panel that met a certain aesthetic with adequate strength to efficiently span our office grid and accomplish the two-way cantilevers at our roof overhangs. CLT was able to achieve all of this while also acting as our seismic diaphragm.

What advice do you have for someone considering CLT [or mass timber in general] for the first time?

Bethany: As a designer, it’s important to understand the limits and advantages of the material. Mass timber’s sustainable life-cycle aspects and biophilic aesthetics make it an attractive building material; however, you need to carefully consider service routing, acoustics, and fire rating. The design aesthetic is one of the advantages, so typically the goal is to avoid covering the mass timber structural system with GWB and service chases or soffits.

Also, as stated in the beginning, mass timber doesn’t have to be all-or-nothing. On 2005 Poplar, we incorporated a hybrid system to take advantage of the attractive mass timber material where it made sense, but in tandem with a steel structural system.

Bill: As a builder, my two [or four] cents…

• Complete a comparative cost study and consider a range of hybrid steel/timber systems. Don’t limit yourself to all steel vs. all mass timber.
• Seek input from the entire team when performing cost studies: architect, structural engineer, general contractor, and specialty subcontractors.
• Verify building department requirements for permitting far in advance. This may require on-boarding the mass timber supplier early in design.
• Thoroughly understand the fire-resistive requirements and aesthetic desires. These might compete with each other in some circumstances.

Want to learn more? Check out part II of this blog post series.